This pic of the latest ROLLING STONE cover (hitting stores Friday) has been circling the internet today, baffling many innocent minds, including mine. I mean, is this Rolling Stone or Playboy or Maxime? We see RIHANNA here wearing what looks to once have been denim shorts - before they were ripped apart by a wild beast! Moreover - the shorts don't even look real but sloppily photo-shopped right over her naked butt, leaving very little to imagination. What's with you Rolling Stone? First that despicable creature Snooky on your cover and now Playmate Rihanna, who "strikes back" with her buttocks? I can tell they were trying to be "provocative" here, but still - an Epic Fail on every account.
Posts
I loved the cover though :p
ReplyDeleteI think Rihanna looks fab here, I just think the shoot concept and styling was a little off for the magazine
ReplyDeletehttp://fashionloving.wordpress.com
I agree it would look fine on a man's magazine cover. Though I'd still prefer that shorts looked more realistic... Photo-shopped clothes looks silly to me
ReplyDeletehmmm... idk i used to love rihanna but i don't really like her anymore. i think those "shorts" are miserable, your right they don't even look real!
ReplyDelete